User talk:Ressmonkey

Make comments here || Ressmonkey 21:21, 4 July 2007 (CEST)

Res Monkey, that funky junky, Res Monkey Simply Amazing 19:38, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Allright fixed build:Dervish Supa Tank. Check it out, maybe give it a rating. Maybe even a good rating...(Cypher V 04:23, 15 August 2007 (CEST))

What do you mean when you say Avatar of Balthazar + Armor of Earth isn't working? It works fine for me. (Cypher V 04:17, 15 August 2007 (CEST))

There is an armor cap of +25 which can be beaten by a single skill. So if you have armor of earth and Avatar of Balthazar on at the same time, only armor of earth's bonus takes effect. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 14:20, 15 August 2007 (CEST)

Ok, comment :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:53, 27 July 2007 (CEST)

COMMENZOR. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 02:50, 5 August 2007 (CEST)

Oh hey by the way how do you like the guild [HERO]? Do they do AH? (Cypher V 18:09, 14 August 2007 (CEST))

[HERO] is an ok guild. Pretty big guild/alliance, but not much advantage to being in it. And no, we do not HA normally. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 00:07, 15 August 2007 (CEST)

Hey man thanks for the feedback on my build. If you feel like it, you should try it out. I wanna get some ratings up. You are right about deadly paradox, it would help a lot, but you would have to take out resurrection signet, so i put that under suggested skills for AB. Thanks for the suggestions! (Cypher V 18:05, 14 August 2007 (CEST))

Spawn of Shiro? I seriously saw you somewhere, but I forget where, but I recognize the name. Perhaps in Random Arenas? Or a PvE place? (guildie?!?!) -- Nova -- (contribs) 03:29, 7 August 2007 (CEST)

Well, I have never done Random Arenas with Spawn of Shiro, and I am in the guild [HERO] right now, was in [TI], and some guild that owns Cavalon before that. If it wasnt one of those, then it was some pve area. || Ressmonkey 16:23, 7 August 2007 (CEST)

Must be PvE then... but I'm really sure I recognize the name. -- Nova -- (contribs) 21:42, 11 August 2007 (CEST)

Good job doing the math on the Nightmare Spiking. :) -- Nova -- (contribs) 03:23, 15 August 2007 (CEST)

k... comment is there >>>> is it ok to be there ?? Iwan13_talk 14:11, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

<enter random comment here>--Teh Uber Pwnzer 10:05, 9 September 2007 (CEST)

This is the userpage of the Ressurection Monkey. <- It's not ressurect. It's resurrect. One 's'. Two 'r's. :) --Wizardboy777(T/C) 03:39, 2 October 2007 (CEST)

I know that, it was my spelling mistake 21 months ago when I made my second character Ressurection Monkey, who is uberpwnsome. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 03:41, 2 October 2007 (CEST)

Build:N/Mo Martyr Master

Thank you for your advise and i followed it, it's implented in the Build. Tomoko 13:02, 2 October 2007 (CEST)

RE: Wizardboy777's RfA

Two things. First, to be perfectly honest, I've tired of people discussing whether or not a new Admin is necessary at any given time. The RfA is to discuss the candidate, not to discuss whether he/she is needed at any given time. Part of the idea is that RfAs allow us to maintain a dynamic list of candidates for when a new Admin is necessary. Second of all. Regarding his number of contributions. "Number" of contributions isn't important. If that was the determining factor, my GuildWiki RfA might have enjoyed unanimous success ;). However, it didn't. And why? Because the quality of the contributions is what really matters. I can't think of more than 2 or 3 people who are willing to sit down for an hour an more and just move builds from Abandoned to Trash, or add Delete Tags to redirect pages. Thanks to Wizardboy, maybe the Grace Expired category will finally be empty (for the first time in site history). *Defiant Elements* +talk 01:26, 24 October 2007 (CEST)

Well, if every admin would spend 10 minutes a day doing what he does, the same thing might happen. After all, "Administrators don't do very much" as you so eloquently put it, so they should have plenty of downtime between banning to help. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 01:31, 24 October 2007 (CEST)

First of all, that assumes that all Administrators can be on daily. Additionally, while I spend a lot of time on Wiki, I'm usually doing other things as well, usually working. What that means is that while I can respond to some requests and patrol RCs to some degree, I don't always have time to just sit down and delete stuff. Besides, the fact of the matter is that it hasn't happened. Second of all, I can tell you from personal experience that moving/deleting/editing even a dozen pages can be time consuming. *Defiant Elements* +talk 01:36, 24 October 2007 (CEST)

You need some sort of delete all in category button or something. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 01:38, 24 October 2007 (CEST)

I deleted User:Ressmonkey/Temple Smite Guide as per PvX:Redirect. --Wizardboy777(T/C/Sysop) 02:49, 30 October 2007 (CET)

1000 Contibs

O YEAH! --- Ressmonkey (talk) 04:21, 10 November 2007 (CET)

In before Auron deletes one. --71.208.133.30 04:22, 10 November 2007 (CET)

lolgud1 -Auron 04:23, 10 November 2007 (CET)

ty be here all week --71.208.133.30 04:28, 10 November 2007 (CET)

[1]

Archive, don't trash. Thanks — Skakid9090 01:49, 13 November 2007 (CET)

Ok. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 01:50, 13 November 2007 (CET)

Ty Ress

™Cookie™

COOKIE!!! Lord Belar 22:38, 13 November 2007 (CET)

Block

Participating in talk page faggotry on Rawrawr's talk earned you a one day block. (Don't feel bad, Belar got one month.) -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 02:56, 15 November 2007 (CET)

The Author also asked for it to be deleted :P

I realized through testing that it wasnt as good as it could be so I hoped someone would just delete it xD. --Shadowsin 04:48, 20 November 2007 (CET)

Hey, I'm new at this but I just had some comments on your rate of a build I posted http://www.pvxwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Build:Me/W_Glacial_Stone_Farmer&action=rate why did you rate my build if you clearly didn't read it even? Deflect arrows is for getting past enemies that are enroute to the farming zone. Thank you.(Azan 19:12, 21 November 2007 (CET))

Your vote on R/Me Feral Totem Axe Farmer

What the heck do you mean the R/any and W/R versions do a better job? The above build does it faster than the two. Did you just look at the other votes and vote low or did you even use it correctly?Stryk the Lightning 23:03, 21 November 2007 (CET)

Stryk, please stop complaining to each user seperately. People are aloud to vote without testing the build, and people have a right to their opinion.--Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 23:06, 21 November 2007 (CET)

w/e --- Ressmonkey (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2007 (CET)

Team - Vanquishing Elementalists

Srry for butting in n all that but seeing as ppl cant think above 1 oby tank and 5 SFs it kinda made me said. Anyway rly nice work man. Edwina Elbert*t*c* 11:26, 22 November 2007 (CET)

...

you see me trollin`... the wiki... catch me rating dirty -- Nova -- (contribs) 16:50, 24 November 2007 (CET)

THIS! IS! SPARTAAAAA!

"And dont forget that there is no AoE scatter in HM if u have Spell Breaker on. Love bugs :) --- Ressmonkey (talk) 14:18, 22 November 2007 (CET)"

-- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 08:01, 26 November 2007 (CET)

I dont get it the reference to 300... --- Ressmonkey (talk) 13:15, 26 November 2007 (CET)

You must be mistaken. This is PvXwiki. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 13:16, 26 November 2007 (CET)

PvXwiki? --71.229.204.25 13:27, 26 November 2007 (CET)

Ooo... We are doing refrences to 300? How about the 300 Cat? Joshgt2 (Talk) 14:39, 26 November 2007 (CET)

What about this!? GODLIESTalk 14:53, 26 November 2007 (CET)

imo ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 22:18, 26 November 2007 (CET)

Hey, sorry I don't know how I could be messing the site up, I use Opera as my web browser other than that iunnoUndergunned 04:45, 29 November 2007 (CET)

Build:Rt/Mo 330hp Vengeful Spirit Bonder

Your reasoning on your rating is "pretty good and relatively fast, but waaaay too counterable". Does this really explain the 2 in universality? Is there really no place in the game that does not contain a counter to this build? -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 10:53, 20 December 2007 (EST)

Yes it does. The main justification for my vote is farming in the underworld. If it was unable to farm in the UW, I would have given it a 2 in effectiveness since 55s or SoA sipirit bonders are much more versatile. In UW, there is both interrupts and enchant removal. This causes a big problem since they both are counters to this build. So -3 universality. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 15:34, 20 December 2007 (EST)

That's pretty harsh, and regardless, it's not designed just for UW. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 02:11, 1 January 2008 (EST)

Its not??? --- Ressmonkey (talk) 08:19, 1 January 2008 (EST)

I was farming HM kappas earlier for the lulz. This build can do just about anything. --71.229@home

When I was testing it, its main purpose was for UW HM. It appears to have changed then... Ill change my vote. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 09:29, 1 January 2008 (EST)

Build:A/W SP Trampling Ox Assassin

Leave in great please.Bob fregman 21:37, 31 December 2007 (EST)

Hey, Ressmonkey

Are you a leet caller? -- Nova -- (contribs) 09:13, 5 January 2008 (EST)

r u iQ?!?!?!??!?!??!!?!!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!!?!???!?!?! 84.9.10.165 09:40, 5 January 2008 (EST)

No way, I suck at pvp. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 09:44, 5 January 2008 (EST)

^ - Rawrawr 09:46, 5 January 2008 (EST)

lol PvP > PvE tbh ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 11:27, 5 January 2008 (EST)

My mind is more configured mathematically. What I mean by that is that I need things to be 100% (maybe 90%) consistant. Because of that, I dont like pvping because the enmies actions will be inconsistant and the enemies skills. Thats why I make lots of farming builds, cuz thats where my talents are best used. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 11:44, 5 January 2008 (EST)

YOU HAVE OCD TOO? -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 14:49, 5 January 2008 (EST)

Nooo... I dont like it, but I can live with it... Why, do u? --- Ressmonkey (talk) 15:06, 5 January 2008 (EST)

Feels like it sometimes :P -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 15:19, 5 January 2008 (EST)

why'd you make my build trash build?Arthurperson 20:40, 1 February 2008 (EST)

He left the wiki and he'd need a link to tell you anyway. I'm guessing you meant the HB monk. Renew Life is bad, Words of Comfort is bad, there are better choices than Healing Touch, SoRejuv is bad and isn't affected by HB, Holy Haste + PS is bad, and Holy Haste is just redundant here. --71.229.204.25 20:55, 1 February 2008 (EST)

EDIT!

Changed my vote due to me being a bloody hippocrit.--Shadowsin 21:58, 6 January 2008 (EST)

YAAAAAYYYY!!!! --- Ressmonkey (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2008 (EST)

<3--Shadowsin 21:59, 6 January 2008 (EST)

WTB Links to those quizes, and was wondering if you think i should submit that build i maed for your contest?--Shadowsin 22:19, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Dont remember how I linked to those quizes, soory :(. As for the build, if you can find a good spot to farm, absolutely. And by a good spot, I mean something like the UW (if it could do UW) or DoA, which it probably cant do either. But if u do get a good spot submit it since its gots lots of potential. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 22:25, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Okies. :D (has to make an ele first xD) anyway no links aww D:--Shadowsin 22:26, 6 January 2008 (EST)

1500 Contribs

YEAH!!!! --- Ressmonkey (talk) 23:07, 8 January 2008 (EST)

Congratulations! — Victoryisyours (talk/RfA) 07:13, 10 January 2008 (EST)

Thx :) --- Ressmonkey (talk) 07:13, 10 January 2008 (EST)

Just Categorised Every Build that has a Vote on It

And it feels good. Not really, took an hour and my eyes hurt from looking at screen too long, good thing im looking at my keyboard right now. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2008 (EST)

You is fail? Some of us make livings staring at screens. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 02:17, 10 January 2008 (EST)

Im sure you look away every now and then. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 07:10, 10 January 2008 (EST)

Wait, you assigned builds a category with a vote on them? — Victoryisyours (talk/RfA) 07:14, 10 January 2008 (EST)

NO I went through every tested and untested build and if it was in the wrong category, I changed that. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2008 (EST)

You mean the rating riiight?BaineTheBotter 08:18, 10 January 2008 (EST)

[2]

sowwy — Victoryisyours (talk/RfA) 20:34, 10 January 2008 (EST)

Np, its my fault for forgetting to put the attribute points into inspiration. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 20:35, 10 January 2008 (EST)

UW

Umm, ressmonkey. I once got an ecto drop from an Aataxe, not too long ago either. I was 3 man trapping uw.--FireTock 10:48, 13 January 2008 (EST)

Did I say aatxes didnt drop ectos? I know they do. I was talking about grasping darknesses, which have never been known to drop ectos. Sorry for the confusion. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2008 (EST)

o.0 graspings drop ectos. -- Nova -- (contribs) 16:00, 15 January 2008 (EST)

No they don't. –Ichigo724 16:38, 15 January 2008 (EST)

They really dont, look on GW. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2008 (EST)

Request

Do you mind not being a bit of an ass and making me look like an idiot on your build talk pages? Thanks. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 21:21, 15 January 2008 (EST)

Awww, but I do enjoy it so. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2008 (EST)

A message for the distinguished opposition

@ [3] -
You don't stand a chance imo ;) ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 20:17, 19 January 2008 (EST)

I'd say he's right. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 20:21, 19 January 2008 (EST)

Id say ur both wrong, and Skakid 4 pres 08. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 20:33, 19 January 2008 (EST)

Unexist

I'll have to advise you to stay away from him. He's a BM, it's his job to rate builds. Any more NPA violations and it'll be a ban. Mike Tycn(punch out) 20:36, 20 January 2008 (EST)

Wow, when Im in an awesome mood, I play minesweeper like a rabid squirrel on crack. I just got 56 seconds on 40 mines 16x16 grid and it feels good :). My previous best was 67 seconds. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 22:07, 20 January 2008 (EST)

I've never won a single game of minesweeper - just not my thing. But good job. Mike Tycn(punch out) 22:55, 20 January 2008 (EST)

Minesweeper

How do you play it? I suck at it and can't figure it out. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 01:50, 21 January 2008 (EST)

I JUST BEAT BEGINNER LEVEL IN 115 SECONDS. I THINK I AM GETTING THE HANG OF IT. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 02:23, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Just did it in 39 seconds :). — Teh Uber Pwnzer 02:35, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Moo

Hihi, active now, voted and added discussion to every build in testing almost, reconsider for my bm nomination plx moo. Fishy Moooo 05:38, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Get 500 contributions. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 06:18, 21 January 2008 (EST)

People on this Wiki

Wtf is wrong with them? They will NEVER accept a new pvp idea unless its already meta. Anybody care to explain or give an example of where im wrong? --- Ressmonkey (talk) 13:29, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Usually new ideas arent as good as the meta, there is a reason why the meta is meta. New ideas that become meta seldom, if ever, first appear here. Bob fregman 13:40, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Then why does this site exist, documentation? --- Ressmonkey (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Actually partially yes, there were people on the original guildwiki who supoport a no original builds policy. There are tons of builds here that are original, some in great, alot in good, a ton in other. It isnt just documentation, but all vetted builds must compete with the meta. For a build not in the meta to get vetted, it needs to be able to play against the meta well.Bob fregman 13:43, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Seconded. Shen(contribs) 13:44, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Go away Shen, ur not wanted. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 13:46, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Stop being so anti social. People on the wiki would be more willing to respect you if you didn't respond to everything like that. --Tab Moo 13:47, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Just another statement, while idk about you and shen, for the most part there is absolutly nothing personal in the voting process. I vote down alot of builds submitted by users who i respect or have no problems with. It's just my thoughts on the build. Try to be more laid back and not take things so personally.Bob fregman 13:47, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Anyways, what original builds? --- Ressmonkey (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Check other and good. Many/most of them builds are original.Bob fregman 13:49, 21 January 2008 (EST)

As in change 1 skill and hope it gets vetted original? --- Ressmonkey (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Some may be, but not nearly all. There are several hundred builds saved here, way more then those in the current meta.Bob fregman 13:51, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Show me 5 examples and Ill consider myself wrong. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 13:55, 21 January 2008 (EST)

And Im not gonna search to prove myself wrong, thats just wierd. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 13:57, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Build:A/R Way of Disruption, Build:N/A Toxic Chill Spiker, Build:Me/A Conundrum Spiker, Build:W/D Endurance Attack Spammer, Build:Team - Contagion Pressure. Here are some random builds that are in Good with the exception of Toxic Chill Spiker which is rated Great.

viзтиαмзѕз 14:01, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Keep in mind that these are just examples of builds vetted that arent/werent at the time part of the meta. Idk if i like them or not. Build:Team - AB CwD Capping team, Build:E/A Incendiary Spiker-was great for awhile, Build:Me/any HB Languor Mesmer, Build:Mo/E Smiter's Boon Healer, Build:W/D Endurance Attack Spammer- uses warrior endurance lol. there are alot more.Bob fregman 14:02, 21 January 2008 (EST)

we both found the endurance attack spammer lol.Bob fregman 14:03, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Yeah, its a pretty awesome build if you ever tried it :p

viзтиαмзѕз 14:04, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Just from the Great PvP section. None of these are meta.

• A/D_Grenth%27s_Grasp_Assassin
• Me/Mo_SoJ_Mesmer
• N/A_Toxic_Chill_Spiker
• P/W_Charge_Paragon
• Team_-_Fever_Strike
• Team_-_Triple_Bonded_Melandru_Smite
• W/E_Aggressive_Hammer

--Tab Moo 14:05, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Ok, 7 of those that you said were atually original, but only one of tabs, which was previously mentioned. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 14:11, 21 January 2008 (EST)

But you only asked for 5 <_<

viзтиαмзѕз 14:14, 21 January 2008 (EST)

I know, I guess I was wrong, but it still pisses me off. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 14:17, 21 January 2008 (EST)

WARNING: This page is 32 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections.

YES!!!! --- Ressmonkey (talk) 14:23, 21 January 2008 (EST)
>:O He made us post builds so that he would have to archive! viзтиαмзѕз 14:25, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Nope, totally unintentional, its just cool. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Me

Hey. I don't know if you actually care or have a problem with me, but i've taken it that you do. If i'm wrong, disregard. If i'm right, i just want to throw out there, as i did above, that any discussions, ratings, etc. that ive involved myself in regarding you or your builds is nothing personal. there is a user or two on the wiki who i flatout dislike. You do not fit that category. I've dissagreed with a vote or two, and i've voted down on a few of your builds, but tbh i think many of the things you've contributed have been solid, and i bear no hostility or ill will towards you. I hope you realize that during discussions i try to remain objective, and it's absolutly nothing personal. This probably applies for other users as well.Bob fregman 15:09, 21 January 2008 (EST)

No ur wrong. I got no problem with you. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 15:11, 21 January 2008 (EST)

And Im sure just about every contributor doesnt vote personally, but it pisses me off when they vote bad again and again and again without actually knowing what theyre even voting on really. People like Unexist, Shen, and a few others simply look at a build, look and see if they think its bad or good. If they think its bad, 1 or less rating. If they think its good, 4.5 or more rating. Thats what annoys me about people on this wiki. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2008 (EST)

As to am i like that, it depends. I'd like to quote an old quote from me that i recently discovered grinch had saved "It doesnt require a whole lot of skill to rate a build without testing it. The funny thing about computers and machines is, everything does what it says it's going to do. So you look at atts, skills, etc. and you can pretty much judge a build. It's not like judging an athlete or student, where a weak or dumb looking person can suprise you. Weak skills with weak synergy are, well, weak." Now, i vote alot of build w/o testing them, but that doesnt mean i dont know what im voting on. Most of the time, I've seen something similar, or it's relativly easy to discern how the build will perform simply by looking at it with a degree of scrutiny. When voting, i try to put builds where i see them, not "iz bad 0-0-0 or iz good 5-5-5". So to answers your question, no, i dont think i'm like that since i do think i know what i'm doing when rating, otherwise i wouldnt rate. That being said, i dont really think shen and unexist are like that either, so idk how you see it.Bob fregman 17:01, 21 January 2008 (EST)

If you dont see them like that, then you must be like that too, since everybody uses themselves as the standard, and if you dont think theyre like that, and you consider youself the same, you must be like them. Thtas all I wanted to know. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:10, 21 January 2008 (EST)

I 1-1-1 when builds are bad, and like that TA Brutal Weapon thingie, it's bad. You can't kill decents teams with that. And I lower votes sometimes by 1 point, if you have some guys who say 5-5-5 it's good while it's a bad build, and it will get into good why it's terribad. Tbh, it's not like i 0-0-0 every build, in matter of fact I usually don't. - Unexist 08:05, 22 January 2008 (EST)

First of all, lowering votes to compensate is against real vetting, DONT DO IT! And you do 2 things: Rate good on already good rated builds, and rate bad on everything else. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 15:26, 22 January 2008 (EST)

Also, how many people would agree with me that there is a cascade effect with votes. One person votes, the next person votes similarly, and so on until all votes pretty much are exacltly the same as the first. This of course only works if the first person is half-decently repuatable, which I probably no longer am since Ive suddently decided to start disliking the asses on the wiki who vote like shit. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:34, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Instigate less. Shen(contribs) 17:36, 21 January 2008 (EST)

I said you werent wanted and Ill instigate all I want. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:36, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Flawed logic. If i dont see you as hitler, then i must be hitler?Bob fregman 17:42, 21 January 2008 (EST)

GODWIN'D THREAD OVER EVERYONE GO HOME. --71.229 17:44, 21 January 2008 (EST)

?? at 71.229. Also, it makes sence to me, and that all that really matters as I was just trying to clarify something for myself. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:51, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Godwin's Law. tl;dr: The longer an internet discussion goes on, the greater the chance Hitler or Nazis will be invoked. Once that happens, Godwin's Second Law comes into play and the only proper way to end the discussion is with a wall of one hundred pictures of Hitler, followed by the immediate banning of everyone involved. --71.229 17:57, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Hmm... Sounds nice. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2008 (EST)

I didnt compare anyone to hitler, i just used it as a (rather poor) analogy. All i wanted to say is that just because i dont percieve shen and unexist the same as ress, doesnt mean that therefore i must be like them. then again, i wouldnt take being like shen or unexist as bad thing.Bob fregman 18:14, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Yeah, I know, but you did say Hitler, OMG I said Hitler! Ah I said it again! But im still suprised I havent gotten NPA'd gfor telling Shen to go away... --- Ressmonkey (talk) 18:26, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Shen isnt one to QQ about that.Bob fregman 17:21, 22 January 2008 (EST)

Im sure somebody besides you and Shen have read those comments, so somebody else might QQ about that. But not so major anyways. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:23, 22 January 2008 (EST)

"Go away" isnt really NPA tho.Bob fregman 17:24, 22 January 2008 (EST)

Im pretty sure "Youre not wanted" is. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:25, 22 January 2008 (EST)

?

Someon keeps changing ur page? got enemies?--Frans 11:37, 23 January 2008 (EST) btw what's NPA?Frans 11:37, 23 January 2008 (EST)

NPA = No Personal Attacks ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 11:38, 23 January 2008 (EST)

Ok ty--Frans 11:43, 23 January 2008 (EST)

that would be me cocksucker lololololololz btw fuck yall

Comment on PvXwiki:Requests for Build Master Status/Bob fregman#Oppose

Completely over the top and unnecessary. Bob Fregman and Unexist are both valuable contributers, just as yourself. Personal attacks are not only not needed, but not allowed as per PvX:NPA. Clarify your vote with specific examples instead of blatantly being a douche. Being a douche generally makes people thing less of you unless you want to be hated around here. Thanks in advance, and toodles. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 16:28, 24 January 2008 (EST)

I dont like u either, just fyi, and I wont do anything of the sort. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 16:30, 24 January 2008 (EST)

You see your comment right above mine? That's the kind of stuff you want to stay away from. Better to be nice to everyone except for Napalm. If someone doesn't ask, don't tell (regarding your negative opinions of other people). You see, I don't give half of a flying fuck about your opinion about me and never will. Furthermore, unless you ask me, I will never give you my opinion on you, out of etiquette and courtesy. Informing people how much you hate them makes everyone like you less, whether or not they're actually dicks. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 17:54, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Obviously that means you hate me... So learn from urself and stop giving information about your opinion of others. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:57, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Pfft, if anything, people should be nice to anyone but you for being such an opressive egotist and a dick head, particularly channeling your hate at users such as ressmonkey and I. Also, by expressing your hate for me, doesn't that make you contradictory in the sense that you are saying people are liked less for expressing their hate towards other users? What about your persecution huh? Can't say shit about THAT one, can you. Why don't you just fuck off for once Grinshpon, and quit while you know you are contradicting yourself, and are just wrong? ~~ Napalm Flame >=] (talk)·(contributions) 18:02, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Even if he does, thats not the point, don't be a dick. (vĭk'tə-rē ĭz yôrz) 17:58, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Its fun and I can, so I will. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:59, 24 January 2008 (EST)

You just love getting b&, don't you? –Ichigo724 18:22, 24 January 2008 (EST)

No... Ive only been banned once and it was 4 the rawrawr talk page awesome faggotry. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Seriously people, observe indents, they're there for a reason. –Ichigo724 18:27, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Why r u talking to somebody that isnt me on my talkpage? I own my talkpage. Mine. All comments directed at me, or so I say. And since I own it, my say goes. So, no I dont like being banned :P. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 18:30, 24 January 2008 (EST)

I AM A FAGGOT. –Ichigo724 18:31, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Yes u r. (I said so) :P --- Ressmonkey (talk) 18:32, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Actually, I've always thought you were quite a nice kid up until a week or so ago with the RFBM. I don't know why you had to go around and be a prick on Unexists & Fregman's pages. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 18:43, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Yeah, I thought so too, but the Unexist just had to piss me off... --- Ressmonkey (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2008 (EST)

tbh unexist is ok, but we know where the problem lies really. ~~ Napalm Flame >=] (talk)·(contributions) 18:48, 24 January 2008 (EST)

The only prblem I have with Unexist is how he rates, which pisses me off, grinch is just kinda annoying and he is on my case about Unexist. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 18:51, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Napalm and Grinch, I've banned you both for a day. Stop bitching at each other or stop contributing. Ressmonkey, I've banned you for three days. Your actions are totally uncalled for. (And by the way, just because it's your talk page doesn't mean you're in complete control.) -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 19:42, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Goodbye

Apparently we are run by democracy-hating, communist-supporting admins. And one that thinks that saying that we shouldve nuked Soviets is racist (its kinda hard to be racist against people that havent existed for 18 years). So, Im doing what any good American would do, and going away (since I cant invade this place). --- Ressmonkey (talk) 06:26, 29 January 2008 (EST)

You calling all soviets "fucking bastards" or whatever was the racist part, and for the record, only my opinion (last I checked I was only one admin). But if you're too blind to see outside the propaganda of patriotism, that's your choice. 'Bye. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 14:19, 29 January 2008 (EST)

You make me scared for this country, Ress. I was hoping Joseph McCarthy took all of his spawn to hell with him when he died. --71.229 14:21, 29 January 2008 (EST)

No, it's a virus, spread by contact with flags and some "news" channels. Lord Belar 17:43, 29 January 2008 (EST)