Are we going to be leaving this as a separate article? May have its merits. -Shen 14:54, 18 February 2008 (EST)

I think having this has a separate policy will make it more accessible to users, due to it covering a different topic than the current BM policy. Something like PvX:APPEAL would work. However, Defiant Elements suggested that this be written as an addendum to the BM policy. We will have to decide on its status prior to implementing it. Btw, thanks for the typo cleanup; it's dreadfully early and I need to sleep. --Scottie bow.jpg Scottie_theNerd (argue/criticise/complain) 14:57, 18 February 2008 (EST)
I think it'd be fine to leave it like this. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2.JPG *Defiant Elements* +talk 15:00, 18 February 2008 (EST)
Leaving it here and making PW/PvX:APPEAL redirect would be fine. Writeup looks solid. -Auron 08:01, 19 February 2008 (EST)
Done. -Shen 19:25, 22 February 2008 (EST

I put this under Conflict Policies, though it's sorta out of place. -Shen 19:35, 22 February 2008 (EST)

I'd put it under build policies. Conflict policies I consider things about personal issues, like calling someone a douche and having a big quarrel over it. This is concerning build rating, so I would say Builds. --GoD Sig3.jpgGuildofDeals 09:28, 24 February 2008 (EST)
Most conflicts and name-calling and the like here originate with a disagreement over a build. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 15:31, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Can I appeal myself too? —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 06:08, 18 June 2008 (EDT)