Looks pretty good. ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:26, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
Should there be a division of the "issues" section into "User issues" and "Build issues"? — Rapta 
(talk|contribs) 05:28, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
Rather than making this actual policy, I may simply add this to the Sidebar in a couple days assuming no one objects (although why anyone would have a problem with this, I don't know). 
*Defiant Elements* +talk 05:36, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- I am against this, because I hate change! And I am lazy! :P Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:49, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- Meh, the page does no harm and I cannot see any objections (other than insipid ones such as Readem's) to this page, so I'm just gonna go ahead and add it to the side bar. It also has the value of being easier to find than the variety of templates that are used for notifying Admins.
*Defiant Elements* +talk 05:51, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- Meh, the page does no harm and I cannot see any objections (other than insipid ones such as Readem's) to this page, so I'm just gonna go ahead and add it to the side bar. It also has the value of being easier to find than the variety of templates that are used for notifying Admins.
- Update: Added to side bar. Hope this helps. *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:53, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- Update: Added to side bar. Hope this helps.
DE, you know you can simply delete and then restore a build article to clear its votes, rather than manually deleting them one-by-one, right? - 
Krowman {{sysop}} 05:52, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- Yeah. But I prefer my method :). Of course, it does clog up Recent ratings, but, I find it's faster actually (i.e. less work for me :P) *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:53, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- Keep things consistent. IS it Admin Noticeboard or Admin noticeboard? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:58, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- Done. *Defiant Elements* +talk 06:00, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- Done.
- Leave them. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:07, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- Once the page starts getting bogged down with resolved issues, we'll simply do what GWW does and archive the resolved issues. *Defiant Elements* +talk 06:16, 23 August 2007 (CEST)
- Once the page starts getting bogged down with resolved issues, we'll simply do what GWW does and archive the resolved issues.
Actual usage of this page
Wish I could make a flowchart of this...
- Leave coding issue
- People debate
- Coding issue is eventually resolved
- Leave IP/general concerns
- Admins look at it, tell who to
stfube more calm and respectful, situation resolved
- Admins look at it, tell who to
- Leave a build whose ratings need looking at
- Armond gets to it
- Armond argues about it
- Huge discussion over said vote is created
- Or
- Armond insta-removes votes
- Armond argues about it
- Other admin gets to it
- Something appropriate happens
- Armond gets to it
Imo. -- Armond Warblade
{{sysop}} 07:01, 13 October 2007 (CEST)
- Ye have so little faith in thyself. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 22:33, 13 October 2007 (CEST)
- Psh, I subst: faith for confidence. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 06:43, 15 October 2007 (CEST)
- Psh, I subst: faith for confidence. -- Armond Warblade
R/me Burning Area
I just posted it but it's not in untested builds but i posted it there... Woefpoef 16:10, 13 October 2007 (CEST)
You forgot the Build: part. I moved it for you. Tycn 16:24, 13 October 2007 (CEST)
Eloc Jcg is at it again...
posted 0-0-0 on http://www.pvxwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Build:E/Me_Obsidian_Mantra_SC_Runner&action=rate for other people making sock puppets. Gave no valid reason for a 0-0-0. I think his vote should be removed. Riff 09:35, 2 December 2007 (CET)
- A) Post this on the actual noticeboard next time. B) It's a way of stopping imba-voting. I'd suggest getting used to it, no matter how unfair it may seem. It's how PvX works, and how the admins and other experienced users keep builds they know to be not-as-good out of higher sections. cedave (contributions_buildpage) 17:18, 2 December 2007 (CET)
- Correction: What Eloc did wasn't a balance vote. For an example of a balance vote scenario, go look at anything Rapta or Tycn voted on. Chances are it's a balance vote in some form or another. cedave (contributions_buildpage) 17:21, 2 December 2007 (CET)
- Wow, I totally feel loved. Anyways, it was an attempt to try and balance out the vote of the sockpuppet. If it's 5-5-5 a sockpuppet put, then I put a 0-0-0 in order for it to be nullified. I did no harm, it's just for an admin to see that there are sockpuppets. — ク Eloc 貢 21:48, 2 December 2007 (CET)
- You should have posted that there were socks on that build on the admin noticeboard. 70.157.62.167 21:50, 2 December 2007 (CET)
- Wow, I totally feel loved. Anyways, it was an attempt to try and balance out the vote of the sockpuppet. If it's 5-5-5 a sockpuppet put, then I put a 0-0-0 in order for it to be nullified. I did no harm, it's just for an admin to see that there are sockpuppets. — ク Eloc 貢 21:48, 2 December 2007 (CET)
- Correction: What Eloc did wasn't a balance vote. For an example of a balance vote scenario, go look at anything Rapta or Tycn voted on. Chances are it's a balance vote in some form or another.
- ::::(Ec)Is it that much trouble to just post the suspected socks on the admin noticeboard? You cause more trouble than you try to allay. 
Shen(contribs) 21:51, 2 December 2007 (CET)
These guys are right. In the future. don't do that. Just post the sock votes on the admin noticeboard for us to remove. Otherwise, we have to remove the sock vote, your 'balance' vote, and resolve any controversy surrounding the votes on top of that. - Krowman {{sysop}} 21:52, 2 December 2007 (CET)
Login Problems
My username is User: Grobie and I cant log in, nor get the form to send me my /a new password. If anyone capable of doing so could send me the password to the email speccified in my accound, or a workaround, or the correct place to go - I would realy appreciate this. 84.114.14.149 16:15, 5 December 2007 (CET)
- Just make a new one, called like Grobie2 or something. I will perma ban that one so you are not suspected of socking. ~~ frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 20:57, 5 December 2007 (CET)
- Done, thanks for the advice Grobilikesmudkips 14:04, 6 December 2007 (CET)
cripshot build vote
whats going on with this? this is allowed? my vote being deleted and being called names like this? look under the cripshot pleaseTalyyn Silent Wind 21:03, 20 December 2007 (EST)
- Post on the actual noticeboard, not its talk page. Feel free to present a case rationalizing your contradictory vote. Stop revoting. Shen has cookies 21:07, 20 December 2007 (EST)
- I didn't revote, fvr said that I could change it...Talyyn Silent Wind 21:27, 20 December 2007 (EST)
- I'm not disagreeing with you on this one Grinch, but please give a better reason for removing the vote other than grate means great or whatever. Maybe you have and you just got sick of retyping it. I'm probably missing something though, as you said you've explained numerous places. Whatever. I love you Grinch, and I miss GW for the time being. I'm getting EOTN for Christmas, so I'll see you around then. Cripshot is a great build, especially when you can get a good team to help you. Bluemilkman/Talk To Me 00:01, 21 December 2007 (EST)
- The short and long of it is, if you're told to revote, that means with a different reason, not the same one. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 00:53, 21 December 2007 (EST)
- The short and long of it is, if you're told to revote, that means with a different reason, not the same one. -- Armond Warblade