PvXwiki
Line 16: Line 16:
   
 
# Shows no signs of experence in gfx, icon making, theme making, php coding, bot making, apache optimization, squid +++. - [[User:Skakid9090|<font color="Black">'''Skakid9090'''</font>]] 14:46, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
 
# Shows no signs of experence in gfx, icon making, theme making, php coding, bot making, apache optimization, squid +++. - [[User:Skakid9090|<font color="Black">'''Skakid9090'''</font>]] 14:46, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
  +
# I dont think he has what it takes to be a PvX admin. [[Image:Ni_sig.JPG|50x19px]][[User:Ni|Ni]] 19:15, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
   
 
==== Neutral ====
 
==== Neutral ====

Revision as of 23:15, 19 June 2007

frvwfr2 (talkcontribs)

Always been a good member of the community, I'm sure this user could be a good admin. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)(contributions) 01:03, 17 June 2007 (EDT)

I accept the nomination User:Frvwfr2 frvwfr2 (talk · contributions)

Support

  1. Yeah, he'd be an excellent admin. He knows the game, is a kind fellow, and very active. I don't see why not. --Mgrinshpon (C/T) 04:02, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. Definatly a good candidate. Couldnt in good mind say a bad word bout this user.--Advent Mongoose Hex Breaker (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
  3. Looks like a fine admin to me. ^ Pretty much what those two said. Been around here for quite a while too, I was personally surprised he wasn't already an admin :P -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 08:05, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
  4. I can see him being an admin, yeh. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 16:30, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
  5. (your vote here)

Oppose

  1. Shows no signs of experence in gfx, icon making, theme making, php coding, bot making, apache optimization, squid +++. - Skakid9090 14:46, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. I dont think he has what it takes to be a PvX admin. Ni sigNi 19:15, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

Neutral

  1. He has yet to express wanting to be an admin... other than letting people vote for him. --Sneakysmith12 06:38, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. (your vote here)