PvXwiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
in: Resolved RfAs, Failed RfAs

Changes: PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/Blastedt

< PvXwiki:Requests for adminship
Back to page
Sign in to edit
mNo edit summary
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 3em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAA;">
  +
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. <span style="color: red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.''
  +
 
=== [[User:Blastedt|Blastedt]] ([[User talk:Blastedt|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Blastedt|contribs]]) ===
  
=== [[User:Blastedt|Blastedt]] ([[User talk:Blastedt|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Blastedt|contribs]]) ===
  +
An overall awesome person! [[User:Blastedt|Blastedt]] 02:45, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
   
−
Bandwagon. [[User:Blastedt|Blastedt]] 02:45, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
'''Request for adminship closed by [[User:Auron|Auron]] on 10:35, 23 July 2007 (CEST). Nomination failed.'''
   
 
:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''
  
:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''
Line 7: Line 11:
 
==== Support ====
  
==== Support ====
   
  +
# Go go gadget Blastedt! --[[User:Dirigible|Dirigible]] 11:25, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
 
# (your vote here)
  
# (your vote here)
   
Line 16: Line 21:
 
# Agreed with [[User:Armond]], needs more of a reason than wagons of banding. ‽[[user:Eronth|<font color=#C60000>-'''('''єяøηħ''')'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[user talk:Eronth|<font color=darkblue>no</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Eronth|<font color=darkgreen> u</font>]]</sup></small> 17:10, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  
# Agreed with [[User:Armond]], needs more of a reason than wagons of banding. ‽[[user:Eronth|<font color=#C60000>-'''('''єяøηħ''')'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[user talk:Eronth|<font color=darkblue>no</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Eronth|<font color=darkgreen> u</font>]]</sup></small> 17:10, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 
# If ever there was a "why not" nomination, it is this one. There's no reason, compelling or otherwise, that substantiates this nomination. [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]] [[user:Defiant Elements|<font color=black>'''*Defiant Elements*'''</font>]] [[user talk:Defiant Elements|<font color=darkred><small>''+talk''</small></font>]] 16:25, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
  
# If ever there was a "why not" nomination, it is this one. There's no reason, compelling or otherwise, that substantiates this nomination. [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]] [[user:Defiant Elements|<font color=black>'''*Defiant Elements*'''</font>]] [[user talk:Defiant Elements|<font color=darkred><small>''+talk''</small></font>]] 16:25, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
  +
# Immature. [[User:86.83.15.245|86.83.15.245]] 01:44, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
  +
# I think part of what brought ruin to the original GuildWiki's build section was the negative attitude perpetuated by Blastedt & some others. Definitely opposed. [[User:64.230.98.144|64.230.98.144]] 03:33, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
  +
#:...What? [[User:Blastedt|Blastedt]] 07:14, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
  +
# O_o... um.... who the hell nominated this guy... oh, he nominated himself, that says everything... (just look at his user page.... he's tryin ta break things)--[[User:Midnight08|Midnight08]] 15:51, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
  +
# Just... no. ~~ [[User:Napalm Flame|'''<font color=#ff0000>Napalm Flame</font>''']] ^_^ [[Image:Napalm_Flame_Sig_Image.JPG‎]] <small><font color=#0000ff>[[User_talk:Napalm Flame|(talk)]]·[[Special:Contributions/Napalm Flame|(contributions)]]</font></small> 03:00, 6 July 2007 (CEST)
  +
# whoru? --[[User:Edru_viransu|<font color="Black">'''Edru viransu'''</font>]]//[[User_talk:Edru_viransu|<font color="Red">'''QQ about me'''</font>]] 08:09, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
  +
#who? and nominated self--[[User:Coloneh|Coloneh]] 08:33, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
  +
# (your vote here)
   
 
==== Neutral ====
  
==== Neutral ====
   
  +
#He is honest, however I switched my vote, as he just made the most arrogant comment... I'd hate to see what he would do if he were a admin [[User:Sneakysmith12|Sneakysmith12]] 04:32, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
 
# (your vote here)
  
# (your vote here)
  +
  +
  +
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.''
  +
</div>
  +
  +
<noinclude>
  +
[[Category:Resolved RfAs|Blastedt]]
  +
[[Category:Failed RfAs|Blastedt]]
  +
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 08:20, 21 January 2008

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Blastedt (talk • contribs)

An overall awesome person! Blastedt 02:45, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

Request for adminship closed by Auron on 10:35, 23 July 2007 (CEST). Nomination failed.

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I accept. Duh. Blastedt 02:46, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

Support

  1. Go go gadget Blastedt! --Dirigible 11:25, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. (your vote here)

Oppose

  1. Just jumping on the bandwagon isn't a good enough reason... -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 07:48, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. Need moar cow-bell. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:53, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  3. blastedJ is better - Skakid9090 08:42, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  4. Agreed with User:Armond, needs more of a reason than wagons of banding. ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 17:10, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  5. If ever there was a "why not" nomination, it is this one. There's no reason, compelling or otherwise, that substantiates this nomination. DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 16:25, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
  6. Immature. 86.83.15.245 01:44, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
  7. I think part of what brought ruin to the original GuildWiki's build section was the negative attitude perpetuated by Blastedt & some others. Definitely opposed. 64.230.98.144 03:33, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
    ...What? Blastedt 07:14, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
  8. O_o... um.... who the hell nominated this guy... oh, he nominated himself, that says everything... (just look at his user page.... he's tryin ta break things)--Midnight08 15:51, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
  9. Just... no. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 03:00, 6 July 2007 (CEST)
  10. whoru? --Edru viransu//QQ about me 08:09, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
  11. who? and nominated self--Coloneh 08:33, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
  12. (your vote here)

Neutral

  1. He is honest, however I switched my vote, as he just made the most arrogant comment... I'd hate to see what he would do if he were a admin Sneakysmith12 04:32, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
  2. (your vote here)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms