PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/Blastedt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Blastedt (talk • contribs)

An overall awesome person! Blastedt 02:45, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

Request for adminship closed by Auron on 10:35, 23 July 2007 (CEST). Nomination failed.

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I accept. Duh. Blastedt 02:46, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

Support

1. Go go gadget Blastedt! --Dirigible 11:25, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
2. (your vote here)

Oppose

1. Just jumping on the bandwagon isn't a good enough reason... -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 07:48, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
2. Need moar cow-bell. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:53, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
3. blastedJ is better - Skakid9090 08:42, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
4. Agreed with User:Armond, needs more of a reason than wagons of banding. ‽-(єяøηħ) ^{no u} 17:10, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
5. If ever there was a "why not" nomination, it is this one. There's no reason, compelling or otherwise, that substantiates this nomination. *Defiant Elements* +talk 16:25, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
6. Immature. 86.83.15.245 01:44, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
7. I think part of what brought ruin to the original GuildWiki's build section was the negative attitude perpetuated by Blastedt & some others. Definitely opposed. 64.230.98.144 03:33, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

   ...What? Blastedt 07:14, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

8. O_o... um.... who the hell nominated this guy... oh, he nominated himself, that says everything... (just look at his user page.... he's tryin ta break things)--Midnight08 15:51, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
9. Just... no. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ (talk)·(contributions) 03:00, 6 July 2007 (CEST)
10. whoru? --Edru viransu//QQ about me 08:09, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
11. who? and nominated self--Coloneh 08:33, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
12. (your vote here)

Neutral

1. He is honest, however I switched my vote, as he just made the most arrogant comment... I'd hate to see what he would do if he were a admin Sneakysmith12 04:32, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
2. (your vote here)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.