PvXwiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:
 
==== Neutral ====
 
==== Neutral ====
   
  +
# - [[User:Skakid9090|<font color="Black">'''Skakid9090'''</font>]]º_o 15:35, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
# (your vote here)
 

Revision as of 19:35, 27 June 2007

Blastedt (talkcontribs)

An overall awesome person! Blastedt 02:45, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I accept. Duh. Blastedt 02:46, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

Support

  1. Go go gadget Blastedt! --Dirigible 11:25, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. You know he couldn't be more honest when he said he was going to jump on the bandwagon... plus he did take an initiative to sign up, which this shows he really does want to.--Sneakysmith12 11:27, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
  3. - Skakid9090º_o 07:20, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

Oppose

  1. Just jumping on the bandwagon isn't a good enough reason... -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 07:48, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. Need moar cow-bell. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:53, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  3. blastedJ is better - Skakid9090 08:42, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  4. Agreed with User:Armond, needs more of a reason than wagons of banding. ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 17:10, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  5. If ever there was a "why not" nomination, it is this one. There's no reason, compelling or otherwise, that substantiates this nomination. DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 16:25, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
  6. Immature. 86.83.15.245 01:44, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
  7. I think part of what brought ruin to the original GuildWiki's build section was the negative attitude perpetuated by Blastedt & some others. Definitely opposed. 64.230.98.144 03:33, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
    ...What? Blastedt 07:14, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

Neutral

  1. - Skakid9090º_o 15:35, 27 June 2007 (EDT)