- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Cedave (talk • contribs)[]
cuz he is awesomsauce in a bottle.--Shadowsin 01:13, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Accepted Might as well, if for nothing else but the lulz. cedave (contributions_buildpage) 01:28, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- I'd like to add, as frightening as this may be for some of you, that in light of recent occurrences, and as I've already somewhat mentioned on the talk page here, I will strictly uphold site policies, so long as it is for the better of the Wiki, particularly WELL, You Are Valuable, Real Vetting, and DICK. cedave (contributions_buildpage) 01:15, 9 January 2008 (EST)
Support[]
<3 TBH i believe he is the prime candidate for this policy as he has shown no vote page faggotry or anything else that looks like gangbaning a new user vote page.--Shadowsin 01:13, 7 January 2008 (EST)is not allowed to vote someone i nominated soz D: nomination = auto support.- yay...--Coloneh 09:03, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Yes, of course. Good Helping People. Fair and neutral in comments. Think can be a great Build Master. Chuki 18:24, 7 January 2008 (EST))
- Policy Nazi=Yes pleaseUnder Gunned 22:21, 9 January 2008 (EST)
Oppose[]
- I feel judging him by shens standards is acceptable. I'll dig if i find time.Bob fregman 22:05, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- seeing as his average build rating is below 2.5... i'd be really surprised if he got this.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 23:07, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 09:58, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Oh wai?--Shadowsin 10:07, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- You need to explain votes nao? Ok, I don't think Cedave is simply good enough at builds to be BM. Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:09, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Its not always about making builds, but being able to recognize a great build from a good build, or any trash build, cedave has that distinction. Plus its really hard to make a really great build anymore because all the idea's are pretty much exasted.--Shadowsin 10:11, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- I never said he was bad at making builds. Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:12, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- I never said you did either.--Shadowsin 10:20, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Then why are you questioning my vote? Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:24, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Because its not always just about making builds.--Shadowsin 10:27, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- You compltely lost me, Shadowsin. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 15:06, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Someware in there i completly lost myself o.o' VOTE CEDAVE!--Shadowsin 22:42, 10 January 2008 (EST)
- You compltely lost me, Shadowsin. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 15:06, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Because its not always just about making builds.--Shadowsin 10:27, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Then why are you questioning my vote? Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:24, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- I never said you did either.--Shadowsin 10:20, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- I never said he was bad at making builds. Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:12, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Its not always about making builds, but being able to recognize a great build from a good build, or any trash build, cedave has that distinction. Plus its really hard to make a really great build anymore because all the idea's are pretty much exasted.--Shadowsin 10:11, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- You need to explain votes nao? Ok, I don't think Cedave is simply good enough at builds to be BM. Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:09, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Oh wai?--Shadowsin 10:07, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Never rly see him =\ - Rawrawr 15:58, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Lolwut?--Shadowsin 12:45, 11 January 2008 (EST)
- Although Cedave shows many attributes required of the Brave Masterknight, including bravery, gallantry, strength, and a fondness for romping with men, I feel that untill he has slain atleast three trolls, I can't support his bid for BMship. Ibreaktoilets 04:28, 10 January 2008 (EST)
- lol...— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 18:25, 10 January 2008 (EST)
Neutral[]
- Read that as "awesomesauce in the can." Felt you should know. --71.229 01:31, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Will dig — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 18:26, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Cause he told me to support? idk... -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 01:52, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- I feel judging him by my standards would be too harsh. Shen(contribs) 17:40, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Lol? cedave (contributions_buildpage) 17:45, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- And your standards are? - Unexist 04:25, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Lol? cedave (contributions_buildpage) 17:45, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- I honestly haven't seen him around much. If he starts epic raping builds and stuff I'll move to Support/Oppose, depending on if it's the good rape or the bad rape. --GuildofDeals 15:39, 11 January 2008 (EST)
- Gotta dig too. - Unexist 12:08, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Not yet? Lord Belar 18:31, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.