Jeevus, We have 497 Build stubs. Don't ya think thats a little excessive? I would say nuke em and let the users come back, but I know there are some active users trying to fix a few of the builds in here... Solution anyone? Shireensysop 04:42, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

And all their builds will be voted on when fixed, right? ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 04:50, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Thats the plan, if they fix it, it gets put up for voting. But a lot of these are honestly abandond, which is why they were incomplete in the first place. This is a frustraiting paradox. Shireensysop 04:53, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

actually that was just more complaining that no one finds the corage to rate my seeping build, they obviously wish to rate it 5.5.5., but don't want to get flamed for it. (lol jk nr) ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 04:58, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Delete tags being Placed for any build without significant eddits since June 15th. Check for abandoned tags complete Shireensysop 12:45, 6 July 2007 (CEST)

- Updated/revived abandoned template has been created to assist in propper sorting/categorization of abandoned builds. See template:abandoned for more information. Please tag propperly. Shireensysop 03:50, 6 July 2007 (CEST)

Wow ne1's been here since 2007--Relyk Purifying Veil Sig.jpgRELYK ʞlɐʇ ʎɯ 19:54, 23 July 2008 (EDT)