Talk: W/R Symbolic Warrior

I can't decide between a W/R w/ Antidote Signet and a W/Me with Signet of Distraction or the like. Any thoughts? 85.71.168.42 11:01, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Optional and let them decide for themselves? Godbox

11:02, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Maybe... but then what would the title be? Build:W/Me or R Symbolic Warrior? 85.71.168.42 11:06, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Have it W/R and have antidote Signet. It can then run as a ganker in GvG, and has good survivality for RA. Had a test of this, as i was gonna post this exact samebuild until i had a search of the builds. HAs relli good dps. Have hit for over 100+ on symbolic on most uses of it. Zuko 07:26, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

What's the idea of symbolic with only 3 signets. It deals +36dmg, which is just as much as Executioner's Strike's bonus dmg. ¬ Master Gladius 09:10, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Yea, for half to adrenal cost! /FrosTalk\ 09:10, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

But you have to wait for Evisc. anyways. Run Cleave with it I say... Isn't Dismember 5adr? ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 09:15, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Then you should you something to go with it like dismember. There you've got a cleave build with better dmg and no elite. Just thinking what could be the best choice for the elite. ¬ Master Gladius 09:16, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Dismember->CLeave->Symbolic. And put Poison Tip Sig as an option. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 09:18, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Cleave and Symbolic does seem a bit tasty. /FrosTalk\ 09:20, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

5Adr spike, similar to Evisc. Less Utility, as no DChop, but similar pure damage. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 09:21, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

If you replace Eviscerate with Dismember... what do you take out to make room for an elite...? 85.71.168.42 09:22, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

You'd have to drop Bulls, which would be a killer... But still, I would put it in testing. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 09:37, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Take cleave, to answer your question /FrosTalk\ 09:40, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

I like my free 100 damage DW No 09:40, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

What? You mean Evisc? ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 09:42, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Yeah pretty much Evisc > Cleave No 09:44, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

It gimps the bar less and bulls is almost necessary No 09:44, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

(EC)Not when the rest of your chain charges in 5 hits. But yeah, in general. THis build would be more for pressure than Evisc would. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 09:45, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Take Evisc and then an interrupt such as Distracting Strike, Disrupting Chop, etc, IMO. --File:GoD Wario Sig.JPG*Wah Wah Wah!* 09:47, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Eviscerate + Bulls > Cleave + Dismember (at least for what I was intending). 85.71.168.42 10:45, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Merge[]

They're identical builds, one of which was created before the other. Why/what are we merging exactly? 85.71.168.42 10:46, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

To all dismember people[]

This is good the way it is. If you're gonna wait till evis is pumped, ur doing it wrong. You can simply spam symbolic strike without eviscerate anyway; cuz it's +dmg, and +dmg is pressure. Just do evis + symbolic the next time it will be charged, as evis will be charged around that time anyway. —ǘŋ Ɛxɩsƫ 13:52, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

You're such a euro. — Rapta

(talk|contribs) 13:54, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

<3 --

Tab Moo 13:54, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Stfu you wanna-be euro. At least I euro 4 real. —ǘŋ Ɛxɩsƫ 13:56, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Er[]

Why Sprint instead of Rush? -- Armond Warblade {{sysop}} 17:24, 19 June 2008 (EDT)

Splitters need rush, since they need an IMS to get to stuff, Rush needs adrenaline, so, yea Sprint /FrosTalk\ 17:28, 19 June 2008 (EDT)

Oh. Duh. Ok. -- Armond Warblade

{{sysop}} 17:41, 19 June 2008 (EDT)

delete[]

was never meta, its bad. Gringo 01:54, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

added a well tag[]

we can leave the elite optional on the other and list primal and eviscerate, but i think keeping primal is just better, but if anyone cares we can add evis. Gringo 02:44, December 14, 2009 (UTC)